
Home

Computational Ecology and Software, 2011, 1(4): 224-239
[XML] [EndNote Tagged] [BibTex] [

Full PDF (157K)] [Comment Article]

Article

Comparison of numerical simulations of reactive transport and chemostat-like models

I. Haidar¹, F. Gerard², A. Rapaport¹
¹UMR INRA/SupAgro ’MISTEA’ and EPI INRA/INRIA ’MODEMIC’, 2, pl. Viala 34060 Montpellier, France
²UMR INRA/SupAgro/CIRAD/IRD ’Eco&Sols’, 2, pl. Viala 34060 Montpellier, France

Received 17 August 2011; Accepted 21 September 2011; Published online 1 December 2011
IAEES

Abstract
The objective of the paper is to evaluate the ability of reactive transport models and their numerical implementations (such as MIN3P) to simulate simple microbial transformations in conditions of chemostat or gradostat models, that are popular in microbial ecology and waste treatment ecosystems. To make this comparison, we first consider an abstract ecosystem composed of a single limiting resource and a single microbial species that are carried by advection. In a second stage, we consider another microbial species in competition for the same limiting resource. Comparing the numerical solutions of the two models, we found that the numerical accuracy of simulations of advective transport models performed with MIN3P depends on the evolution of the concentrations of the microbial species: when the state of the system is close to a non-hyperbolic equilibrium, we observe a numerical inaccuracy that may be due to the discretization method used in numerical approximations of reactive transport equations. Therefore, one has to be cautious about the predictions given by the models.

Keywords reactive transport models; chemostat model; microbial growth; numerical simulation.

International Academy of Ecology and Environmental Sciences. E-mail: office@iaees.org
Copyright © 2009-2024 International Academy of Ecology and Environmental Sciences. All rights reserved.
Web administrator: office@iaees.org, website@iaees.org; Last modified: 2024/4/20

Translate page to: